Thought chains 5.

Paleontology of Superconsciousness and telepathy.

Then multicellular creatures began to arise and the specialization of different cells in the field of application began. The stomach, blood-lymph systems, and, finally, nerve cells and their communities: ganglia and brains. And also with a specialization in receiving Temporal Waves. But the role of the Temporal Waves themselves, as, at first, the ONLY carrier of information, began to fall! Their perception began to be pushed aside by more advanced sensory and analyzing structures “somewhere to the side.” But still, how atavism persisted. And so, gradually, a “Superconsciousness disconnected from Consciousness” appeared.

It turned out to be a coherent and consistent explanation of the properties of Superconsciousness and its connection with telepathy.

And now, reader, look through the entire mental chain with your eyes from the first idea of bending space and changing the course of time by any force fields to telepathy these days!

And, at the same time, look again at the pirouettes of a flock of starlings to the music of Dmitry Shostakovich’s Second Waltz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OgermWn-C4 , filmed in Israel,

and involuntarily think: But that’s exactly what the BRAIN THINKS!

A CHARMING PICTURE!!! Fascinating!

And Temporal Waves, is there any other “work” for them?

Absolutely. They are the “hidden parmeter” of Einstein, which ensures the unpredictability of the behavior of microparticles. This is how they, these waves, RECONCILED Einstein and Bohr in their decades-long dispute about causality in the microcosm. It is a pity, of course, an inexpressible pity that they did not live to see this moment of complete reconciliation! It turns out that both were right! And Einstein, with his idea of certain “hidden parameters” (still categorically rejected by theoretical physicists), is right that it is FUNDAMENTALLY impossible to predict the behavior of particles and it is impossible to determine with infinite accuracy their place in space (coordinate) and velocity (momentum).

It is quite possible that with their help it will be possible to explain and revise many phenomena of Quantum Theory (for example, the so-called zero vibrations of the crystal lattice), transmutation of elementary particles, “knocking out” antiparticles from the vacuum, its “polarization” and much more …

For several years in a row, I was asked one big idea: To find NON EXPERIMENTAL, A PRIORI method of evaluating the truth of a scientific idea. After all, how is science usually done?

Some kind of hypothesis is being put forward.

Then it is tested experimentally.

If the experiment more or less confirms it, it becomes a theory.

But often the experiments themselves are expensive, time-consuming, and take a long time both for the experience itself and for its preparation.

And a thought came into my head: is it possible to somehow evaluate the hypothesis in ADVANCE, before the experience.

It immediately became clear that in order to do this, we need to find a CRITERION by which we can “evaluate” the hypothesis: is it true or false?

At first, a stupid idea came to me — this criterion may be the “BEAUTY” of the hypothesis. The idea, as well as the very concept of beauty, is very subjective.

If she is beautiful, then she is certainly faithful, and ugly, so it is not worth “caring for” her.

I was very quickly convinced of the complete idiocy and failure of the idea. A lot of very beautiful-looking ideas and hypotheses turn out to be completely wrong. I’ve seen it myself a couple of times. In the “pan effect”, for example, I put forward, it seemed to me, a beautiful idea explaining the rotation of a pan of water by the action of a pouring water jet in the opposite direction to the rotation of the jet! We turn the rubber tube from which the water flows, say, clockwise, and the pan rotates in the opposite direction! So, I came up with an “explanation”. Due to the inflection of the rubber guide tube, the water flow in it is twisted. And when we wash the inner walls of the pan with this rotating jet, it begins to rotate the pan in the opposite direction due to the friction of water against the walls. It was a beautiful explanation, I thought, not because it was mine, but simply because it was witty and elegant.

However, there was one artificiality: Why the jet of water always twists in the opposite direction to the rotation of the tube. But I decided that this is how the shifting inflection “makes her”.

Everything is fine!

Yes, but ABSOLUTELY WRONG!

After a while, I realized the true reason – the jet presses on the bottom of the pan and it tilts slightly. An inclined plane is created, which is pressed by the jet. By rotating the jet, we create a kind of running inclined plane, which ALWAYS turns the pan in the direction opposite to the direction of the jet movement! The explanation is simple, UGLY, but, alas, correct!

So I had to abandon the tempting idea of beauty contests of ideas.

I started looking for other criteria. I turned around, searched, fantasized and came to the conclusion that there is no such criterion in fact!!! (See the series of notes devoted to the A Priori Criterion of Truth). Several years of thinking have been thrown into the trash (don’t be scared, I thought about more than that!)

Then I noticed such a phenomenon (“magic key”, hint?): A good hypothesis is not always, but very often, as I mentioned above, it has a certain “stardom”, that is, it casts its rays into adjacent fields of knowledge and even, sometimes, its rays penetrate into completely remote from the “place of birth and application”spheres!

And only tonight, when I woke up, I suddenly realized that this is the criterion I was looking for! The long-awaited AKI!

If an idea invented to solve a specific problem, and the creator did not even think about its other applications at the time of the idea’s birth, suddenly finds its application in completely different, even “alien” areas, and, as it were, “by itself”, then this says A PRIORI that the idea is GOOD AND, APPARENTLY, IT IS TRUE!

For example, the idea of portions of Planck’s energy, which he himself considered ONLY as a convenient mathematical technique, turned out to be extremely fruitful and immediately began to explain many mysterious phenomena in physics. Einstein was the first to notice this, who took Planck’s idea “seriously” and applied it to light. He “created” a PHOTON portion of light at once, explained the photoelectric effect and luminescence incomprehensible to physicists before him! On the basis of this ONE hypothesis, an entire science, the Quantum Theory section of physics, later arose! That’s how stellar this idea turned out to be, which its creator himself thought of as a “mathematical trick”!

The described “thought chains” also clearly show the hypothesis of Temporal Waves, which have not yet been experimentally discovered by anyone (in fact, they have long been discovered, but not understood and interpreted completely falsely), as a very promising idea in the sense of TRUTH. And she’s not the only one.

The idea of “bending space and changing the course of time” not only by gravitational, but by any other force fields (from which, in fact, the hypothesis of Temporal Waves was born), the idea of Superconsciousness, the idea of an organism as a cellular dump, where cells fight each other more for a “piece of pie” than cooperate, the idea of behavioral thinking of ANY kind ORGANISMS, even unicellular organisms and viruses, the idea of a radical revision of the causes of the Brown movement, all these “perverse” hypotheses may well turn out to be TRUE.

We will think further and, if possible, better!

11 V 2019