(Continuation of the idea “The nucleus planetary model” 20 I 2024)
I have described more than once the two main models of the nucleus created by my brain, which is not professional in nuclear physics:
One is a dandelion–like nucleus, with protons inside, and the outer layer is a neutron “coat”, that is, protons around which electrons rotate in elliptical orbits OUTSIDE the body of the nucleus, but only a piece of their orbit entering the surface layer. (“The core is God’s dandelion” 24 IV 2024)
The second one is generally “mysterious.” There are no protons or neutrons in the nucleus, but there are two immiscible “electric entities” – positive and negative. Depending on the magnitude of the charge, the nuclei are represented by different quantitative ratios of these entities. These entities become particles with one charge or another or neutral ones ONLY when they are ejected from the core.
Here I will continue my fantasies on the topic of the second model. Why does the name include the word “Planetary”? Because there was a thought about the physical structure of the core with such entities, like the Earth. There are two layers, just like magmatic zones in the Earth’s structure, but there are only two in the core: a shell of positive and a shell of negative electric entities.
In the cores (in our world) inside, their central part is a negative entity. On the outside, there is a more or less “thick” positive entity.
In the cores (in the antiworld), on the contrary, there is a negative electrical essence outside and a positive one inside. Both are completely homogeneous and NOT PORTIONED!!! They become portions when a particle is released. When particles are absorbed from the outside, the reverse process of DEQUANTIZATION occurs, that is, one or another essence of the particle becomes part of the non-atomized essence of the nucleus.
Protons, positrons, and positive mesons are produced from the positive essence (upon ejection).
From the negative essence – beta electrons, antiprotons, negative mesons.
Now the most interesting part: These entities do NOT mix, but they can somehow interact with each other, giving birth to neutrons, neutral mesons, positronium, gamma quanta and neutrinos.
For me, neutrinos and antineutrinos are the same thing, like any photons with different helicity, right or left (spin).
No one has yet observed the “annihilation” of neutrinos and antineutrinos, just as no one has observed the “annihilation” of photons with multidirectional spin.
Neutrinos are generally natural NULL RAYS or NULL QUANTA, where two oppositely directed electric and magnetic strengths are mutually balanced, so they almost do not interact with matter, because no electrically or magnetically active “probes” “stick out” of them.
They are electromagnetically neutral, ZERO PARTICLES! And therefore – The Main Thieves of energy from our world! Perhaps to other worlds, perhaps at the edge of our universe, peacefully sleeping in neutrino cemeteries, releasing huge amounts of stolen energy there.
(Quasars and other fantastic “Ilyich’s light bulbs” of the universe, or whole chandeliers suspended from its “ceiling”).
By the way, as we can see, the interesting nature of the interaction of intracellular entities is that they differ in their results. Then some particles, corpuscles, and all unstable ones are born. The longest decay time is for neutrons, with an average of 11 minutes. The rest are more than short–lived.
Or types of radiation, LONG-LIVED, gamma photons and neutrinos.
This immediately suggests, perhaps, the interaction time of the two shells. When it is very short, gamma quanta and neutrinos are born. When it lasts a little longer, certain particles and their combinations are formed.
It is necessary to take into account that both the space and time inside the nuclei have a different character, different from our macrospace and macro-time. For us, these processes are usually vanishingly short. For “THEM”, these are the same “normal”, rather prolonged processes of formation or corpuscular combinations or fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. For “THEM,” our second is “centuries” or entire “geological epochs.”
This is the end of my NON-science-fiction fantasy theme.
For now!
Faciant meliora potentes.
If I’m wrong, let my seniors correct me.
19 VIII 2025