In order to check the DEFLECTION of the beam transverse to the Earth’s orbital motion vector (30 km/sec), no interferometers are needed.
You just need to send a laser beam to an object located in a plane perpendicular to the Earth’s velocity vector in orbit.!!!
It can be reflected from a mirror on a high-altitude balloon, or from a mirror on the roof of a skyscraper or Eiffel Tower at a time when they are just in the position coinciding with the mentioned plane! Or, most impressively, send this transverse beam to the Earth’s satellite, whose orbital plane is also “normal”, perpendicular to the Earth’s velocity vector.
Then it will deviate forward towards the movement of the Earth so much that it can be measured almost with a tape measure.
Of course, taking into account the influence of atmospheric effects.
The same can be verified using two satellites in order to avoid the influence of errors introduced by the atmosphere.
You can also check the aberration of light, the reverse of Bradley’s finding, when the Earth is “standing” and the brightly glowing satellite is moving. Is it then necessary to rotate the telescopes at the appropriate angle “towards” the velocity vector of the satellite? If aberration is observed in two different telescopes at diametrically opposite points on the earth’s surface, as it SHOULD be according to the Special Theory of Relativity, then this will again confirm the phenomenon of the tilt of the front of the light wave emitted by a moving object.
Although, of course, Michelson’s experience with a light source STATIONARY relative to each other, refractive (splitting into two beams) plate, mirrors and a receiver is much more convincing and obvious!
A similar experiment can be done with milli-microwave radiation using precision masers or radio telescopes.
I think that even the rotation of the Earth around its axis, which is incomparably slower (almost 65 times slower at the equator than the speed of the Earth on orbit), can also be detected in such an experiment.
I am sure that such a deviation will be easily detected, and THUS the proposed Additional Postulates to the Special Theory of Relativity can be considered proven.
(As they were, de facto, proved long ago in 1881-1887 by Michelson’s experiments, but they have been accepted “by default” for almost one hundred and forty years without the slightest attempt to explain them.)
Faciant meliora potentes.
27 II 2026