Antimagnetic monotony.

Continuation and development of the topic of the note “Antimagnetic constancy” 20 IV 2024.

The question is the same as in it and with VERY FAR-REACHING CONSEQUENCES:

Can a magnetic field be generated by a uniformly moving, completely homogeneous, NON-CONSISTING of any “atoms of electricity” (electrons, protons, ions, etc.) edectric flow?

This question is not idle or frivolous, but extremely important. because it touches the foundations of electromagnetism and electrodynamics.

So, let’s conduct such a thought experiment for clarity and a clear understanding of the problem.

There is a kind of transparent tube for vision. It flows completely homogeneous, without any

discreteness, that is, discontinuity, an atomless electric liquid plus or minus, the charge sign is completely unimportant. Let’s even assume that it glows with a certain bluish or any other color. Either it reflects the sun’s rays falling on it, or it has self-illumination for some reason.

What would an outside observer say when looking at her?

That he sees a kind of uniformly glowing tube.

If we ask him: Is the contents of this pipe moving, or is this uniform glow emitted simply by some kind of resting contents of the pipe?

The observer will tell us that he simply does not know! There is no way to determine whether the content is moving or resting.

Then we’ll tell him: Ah, take a compass and bring it closer to the pipe. If this luminous liquid, which is also electric, moves as we set at the beginning of the experiment, then its flow, that is, the movement of charges, that is, an electric current, SHOULD create a magnetic field in the surrounding space!

He will follow our advice and will be amazed to find that the compass needle does not react in any way to the movement of the contents in the pipe!

Why would he be amazed? Yes, because in the previous sentence we used several false words: “CHARGES. MOVING CHARGES, electric current!”

AND THERE ARE NO CHARGES, there are no atoms of electricity. Through the pipe, a homogeneous electric liquid is uncountable at the subcorpuscular level, INDIVISIBLE and UNBROKEN into something “Separate, intermittent”.

This means that an external observer will not be able to see any changes in the glow (there are no vortices, bubbles, foreign inclusions). It is impossible to determine whether a liquid is moving or standing still by a magnetic field, especially since there is NO magnetic field either!

UNIFORM UNIFORMITY!

And the inner observer, what will he say? He will tell, looking through the transparent walls of the pipe, that he is moving.

And if we cover the inner surface of the pipe with a mirror impermeable layer?

The observer is inside, and he is “made” of the same homogeneous electric liquid (unlike the outside, because it is impossible to “make him” out of nothing else, there is no “other”!) and does not touch the walls of the pipe, he will also not be able to tell whether he is moving or at rest.

Let’s complicate our experiment and make, as in Bernoulli’s experiment, a pipe of different cross-sections.

What will happen then?

Then the sections of the pipe, without changing the section, will not change anything in their “magnetic behavior”.

But the short segments of the pipe, where the flow velocity of the electric fluid WILL CHANGE, they will just begin to create a magnetic field and even emit an alternating electromagnetic field (if the change in motion occurs unequally accelerated!)

Why?

Because in these segments, the electric induction vector varies both in magnitude and direction.

Summarizing, we can say: Where nothing changes, we mean a change in the electric induction vector “D” in magnitude or direction of a homogeneous and indivisible electric fluid, and a magnetic field will not arise.

From this seemingly small and insignificant conclusion, however, something very important and radical follows,

So, from the fourth Maxwell equation, you can safely throw out the term “J”, meaning the conduction current.

This means that the question immediately arises about the magnetic spin moment of the particles, because they are charged and rotate uniformly around their own axis. But they are also INDIVISIBLE, which means that their electric charge is also something homogeneous and indivisible, and again. this means there will be no change in the electric induction vector either, and there will be no magnetic field!

BUT IT IS THERE!!!

So these particles are “arranged” DIFFERENTLY!

How?

As I suggested in my previous notes on the “structure” of the electron, proton, positron and antiproton!

The choice remains:

Or we reject everything that has been said in this and other notes on ANTIMAGNETIC MONOTONY, and then we can calmly fold our hands on our tummy and continue thoughtlessly repeating the learned dogmas.

Or we will accept the above arguments and then we must accept the conclusions just proposed.

Freedom of speech and choice is guaranteed by any constitution, even the Soviet one, which no longer exists, but which still exists!

Faciant meliora potentes.

4 IX 2024

P.S. Just now, on September 7, 2024, an “anti-esprit” thought came into my head: You yourself came up with the glow of this completely homogeneous electric liquid either due to the reflection of the light falling on it or due to some mysterious glow of your own. And once you’ve come up with it, then pay for your idea!

An external observer WILL ESTABLISH with obvious certainty the MOVEMENT of this very liquid and even its velocity by the Doppler shift of its radiation, whether reflected or self-emitted!

Gotcha, dreamer!

At first, I agreed with the Esprit critic: Indeed, any moving emitter will create a Doppler effect, a frequency shift of the reflected or radiated electromagnetic field.

But a little later, a very “seditious” thought came that, perhaps, THIS radiation would not have any Doppler shift, because THERE are NO SEPARATE emitter charges.

By definition, we don’t have them!

There is one absolutely homogeneous, INDIVISIBLE into no particles, continuous liquid. a continuous, “atomless” stream flowing along the pipe. And she probably won’t even create a Doppler effect.

NO, I repeat, no moving emitters or reflectors!

Unfortunately, this idea, although it seems interesting and funny to me, is not amenable to any experimental verification, because our whole world is ATOMIC, that is, divided into discrete particles! We do not have CONTINUOUS “atomless” flows of any essence, even thoughts, at our disposal!