The assumption is absolutely fantastic, but NOT so unreasonable.

Every summer, my plants grow the worst in summer and the best in winter.

Why?

Because although the windows of the living room face almost south (ten degrees east), two-thirds of the windows are blocked by the protruding other wing of the 19-story building, and the higher the sun is above the horizon, the LESS its light falls directly on the plants by the window.

But I know that even on the twentieth of June, sunlight fell on the floor by the window and even a little further. For the last few weeks, since mid-May, I’ve been seeing that the sun barely illuminates the windowsill (and then only its “outer part”), and its radiation does not reach the floor at all. Since the building stands, as it seems to me, straight, there is only one option left:

The Earth’s axis has CHANGED its angle of inclination relative to the ecliptic plane. It has deviated by a greater angle from the vertical (perpendicular to the ecliptic plane)!!!

I checked the verticality of the building with a plumb-line. It is strictly perpendicular to sea level. And the shift of the sun’s position at the zenith is even more vertical in relation to the earth’s surface at our latitude (41 degrees, that is, 49 degrees to the equator!) still, it is significant, according to my very rough estimate, up to ten degrees.
No awnings appeared over my window!

In addition, I have a strange habit of examining the Sun through twenty-strong binoculars with black filters made of evenly blacked X-ray film. This is due to false horror stories about “incessant terrible magnetic storms.” If spots and whole groups of them appear on the Sun, this is usually due to powerful outbursts, prominences, and masses of charged particles that reach the Earth a day or two after the release and cause strong changes in the geomagnetic field with their magnetic fields. Since the middle of May, I just can’t do this, because I have to lift the binoculars almost vertically and very close to the glass of the window. And if you lie down by the window, then the window sill obscures everything!

So, if the previous flimsy assumption is not so flimsy, it immediately explains the warming in both hemispheres.

Moreover, the process is probably with POSITIVE Feedback. The melting of ice caps in the Arctic and Antarctic causes an axial tilt due to the displacement of water masses evenly over the entire surface of the globe (and not in the form of multi-kilometer-thick glaciers concentrated at the South Pole and thick ice of the Arctic Ocean in the north), but an axial tilt due to this displacement of the center of mass. it increases the heating of the northern and southern hemispheres and promotes further melting, and hence additional displacement of water masses on the surface.

The assumption, again, looks completely fantastic and even absurd, but I have a good memory and I have been monitoring the illumination here quite carefully for the last nine years, because I have always tried to ensure that the plants near the window receive a dose of direct sunlight.

What is primary?

Warming up and, as a result, a change in the tilt of the axis, or the tilt and the warming caused by it?

I don’t know, I think it’s warming, but, of course, not because of the alleged carbon dioxide (the concentration of which in the air is 0.03%, that is, only three molecules of carbon dioxide per ten thousand air molecules!!!), but because of some geocosmic phenomena that have repeatedly occurred on Earth: The period of warming was replaced by a glacial one. Glacial – warming and the Earth’s axis HAS ALWAYS CHANGED its position. I believe that the main role is played by the internal processes of CHANGING radioactive decay in the core. Due to their periodic strengthening or weakening, periods change from Glacial to warming and vice versa.

(Below is another possible reason)

Why does the axis of rotation change in space for the Earth spinning in the void, if it is known that the gyroscope (any spinning top) retains the direction of the axis?

The trick lies in two possible causes:

First and foremost: The gyroscope has a center of inertia (center of mass) which DOES NOT CHANGE its position.

And on the globe, because of the huge and MOBILE masses of water and magma, THIS CAN HAPPEN!

(By the way, some kind of displacement of huge masses of magma under the thin crust of the Earth may also be the cause of periodic changes in the global climate. Glacial ages and periods of warming.)

The second reason is that the spinning top Earth is spinning in the gravitational field of the Sun and the fields of the Moon and the nearby planets, which are very small for it. Although the tides of only water, and possibly magma caused by the Moon, gradually slow down the rotation of the Earth around its axis. )

Let’s imagine a kind of “dumbbell” that orbits the Sun and has two bulges at the ends, UNEQUAL in mass. It is obvious that it will turn with a more massive bulge towards the Sun.

And if it also rotates relatively quickly around its own axis perpendicular to the plane of its ecliptic, then due to the unequal gravitational forces on both bulges, its axis will take on a certain inclination with respect to the plane of the ecliptic. What the Earth currently has. And if, moreover, mercury can flow into our dumbbell, say, inside a hollow one, for some internal reasons and laws, then its axis, depending on the position of a significant mass of mercury in it, will NOT be CONSTANTLY tilted at a certain angle to the ecliptic plane, but will CHANGE due to the displacement of the mass center.

Astronomers should DEFINITELY have noticed the slightest change in the direction of the earth’s axis, and even more so, my estimated ten degrees. And, perhaps, THEY HAVE ALREADY NOTICED FOR A LONG TIME, but they are SILENT on the orders of those in power, supporting and justifying the false chatter about carbon dioxide.

Navigators and pilots could also probably notice the shift in the position of the constellations and the Sun using a sextant. And they also keep quiet.

(Something similar about the TOTAL PROHIBITION for ordinary mortals to KNOW SOMETHING DANGEROUS is described in Isaac Asimov’s novel “Cosmic Currents”!)

Again, the idea is weird to the point of fantasy, but I couldn’t think of anything better.

Faciant meliora potentes.

If I’m wrong, let my seniors correct me.

8 V 2025