When my friends started getting married, I quickly noticed a change in our friendships: Meetings were greatly reduced, and the time we spent together was reduced.

WHICH IS QUITE NATURAL:

A wife, a family, a house, then children…

But at the same time, the quality of friendship began to change, which, it seemed, should not have changed: The sincerity and cordiality of the relationship.

The hypocritical SEMBLANCE of these qualities began to take its place.

It would seem that I was on good and friendly terms with the wives of my friends, behaved quite correctly and in a friendly way…That is, they could not have any hostility or dislike towards me..

So, what’s the matter?

I did not drag my friends out of their marital beds and did not impose my friendship on them…

Over the years, understanding came.

When young females acquire males, they try to strengthen this bond, to bind the male more tightly to themselves, because then both she and her offspring are guaranteed a more satisfying (in all respects) and safer life. And she, as a producer of offspring, INSTINCTIVELY needs it. ABSOLUTELY!

Therefore, the female, usually acting UNCONSCIOUSLY, but in full accordance with her governing instinct, tries to attract the maximum attention and care of the male to herself and the “family” – that is, their joint existence with the offspring and his full help in THIS!

Rather than wasting his energy on some “meaningless and UNPRODUCTIVE” relationships with some other males.

There is no need to talk about other females.

This, again, is inherent in instinct, and often a stupid wife, unknowingly, tries to impose this way of thinking and behavior on her husband.

There are two most common types of “families”:

Either a henpecked husband or a domestic tyrant husband.

Again, it is clear that there is no other in the hierarchical herd of slaves (one slave is lower, and the other is the “master” above) and the family, as a “cell of the herd” is built similarly.

Married couples of two free and EQUAL people are extremely rare, because FREE PEOPLE themselves, and NOT HERD CREATURES, appear and spiritually detach themselves from the herd very infrequently.

In the case of a henpecked husband, the wife easily manages to directly, by brute force and pressure, isolate her characterless husband from his former friends.

In the case of a domestic tyrant, the wife has to resort to various tricks (if she has enough intelligence – and women USUALLY have intelligence higher than men), to various workarounds, pressing the tyrant’s “weak and necessary character buttons”, which the woman recognizes very quickly (again, due to her high sensitivity and cannibally cunning intelligence!)

A common and obligatory quality of character for both henpecked and domestic tyrant is a hidden, but incessantly gnawing INFERIORITY COMPLEX, MANDATORY FOR ALL HERD SLAVES.

In a henpecked man, it manifests itself in slavish obedience to a stronger MASTER (Let’s not forget about HIERARCHY!), otherwise the MISTRESS will slap me….

It is the same for domestic tyrants: To climb a little step higher than his wife and THEN, oh sweetness, oh joy, to feel at least at HOME – the MASTER!

Otherwise, IN THE SERVICE, oh, how it’s «fun» to bend, bow and wag my ass in front of a STRONG master, otherwise, HE’ll smack me…

Question:

Why does the author call them fools?

But because this method, seemingly infallible, does not always work in relation to both “alpha males” and “weak-willed voluntary slaves.”

Why?

Usually due to the fact that the female gets too carried away with this instinctive activity, and the male begins to feel an EXCESSIVELY SHORT TETHER! And again, purely instinctively, also obeying the instinct to scatter his genes among the largest number of females (to enrich the gene pool with HIS GENES), he begins to openly or secretly free himself from the bridle thrown over him earlier.

This is not to say that the females do not do the same, striving to ENRICH the GENE POOL of their offspring, and in it they are equally successful as henpecked men and domestic tyrants.

If we look more widely at the question, then again we come to the forms and levels of parasitism. Parasitism appeared on Earth a little later than the appearance of the first creators of life – green algae and plants.

But there is the highest degree of parasitism: Parasitism on individuals of their own species! Cannibalism is just that. And it was he and he alone who created the intellectually advanced cannibal — humans.

None of the million species of living beings practiced parasitizing on their own kind as a norm of life.

ONLY A HUMAN!

And so, all of these million species have failed to achieve the LEVEL of cunning, malice, treachery, ruthlessness, and hypocrisy REQUIRED by CANNIBALISM.

ONLY A HUMAN!

Therefore, he is a superparasite, and ANY social structures created by him INEVITABLY repeat the same STRICT principle of permanent parasitism on their own kind.

THE “Cell” TOO!

Such is the nature of cannibalistic marriage!

Eternal and unchangeable!

You CAN’T ARGUE with the genes that have successfully passed two million years of cannibalistic, cruel and ruthless selection!

Only, here’s the hope for the EVER-PRESENT MUTATIONS…

2 II 2026