I wrote a few notes about a pseudo-perpetual, but very real, “natural” magnetic perpetual motion machine in 2019. The micro-vibrations of the geomagnetic field (local and generalized), varying in frequency, amplitude, and direction, cause the magnets to swing, which in fact are “pseudo-perpetual” motors.
Such magnets on an elastic suspension will swing as long as there is a certain planetary magnetic field. which will be invaded by streams of charged particles from the Sun (or any other star with planets with a magnetic field) and streams of high-energy charged cosmic particles. And the swing time is limited only by the strength and elasticity of the suspension and the duration of the existence of stars and planets with a magnetic field, that is, hundreds of millions and billions of years!

But today I thought about another similar incident, and, judging by a number of signs, it is almost really a PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE.

The most obvious example is the spin of electrons, that is, the rotation of elementary particles – electrons around their axis.

The first and most important question is: Does this electron’s magnetic field interact with the external environment or not?

If it does NOT interact, that is, there is no exchange of energy-momentum with the medium, then, of course, this rotation can last arbitrarily long!

For example, the extremely long-lived neutrino particles. According to my hypothesis, they are natural “null rays”, “null quanta”, “null particles”, that is, two electromagnetic waves superimposed in opposite phases on each other. The energy contained in them can be enormous, but it does not manifest itself EXTERNALLY in any way, because both the electric and magnetic components of the induction of these two waves compensate each other out, and such a “null particle” does not react with anything, because there is NOTHING «reactable”!

So, maybe the spin of electrons is “isolated” from the external environment and therefore persists “forever”?

NOT AT ALL!

The spin, or more precisely, the magnetic moment of particles, interacts very actively with external magnetic fields of both “natural” and “artificial” origin. A phenomenon that has been known for at least a hundred years. Starting with the Stern-Gerlach experiment, which was completely misinterpreted, and any spin interactions that manifest themselves in a variety of phenomena and effects. Such as synchrotron radiation, gyromagnetic effects, superconductivity, electrical resistance of metals, ferromagnetism, etc.

So, electrons interact very actively with the environment both due to their electric charge and their magnetic moment.

WHY, when exchanging energy-momentum with the external environment, do they not stop, losing rotational energy, or accelerate, acquiring additional rotational energy from the outside?

The only explanation that I managed to come up with is the old hypothesis about the energy equilibrium of particles with the environment – space and time, which, according to the hypothesis already expressed more than once, represent some kind of changing electromagnetic fields, which we (and all living beings) only perceive as space and time! Moreover, this balance is maintained by replenishing or withdrawing rotational energy NON-QUANTUM, NOT IN PORTIONS, but continuously.

Just like atoms, despite continuous energy losses due to NON-QUANTUM radiation due to strictly periodic fluctuations in their common atomic electromagnetic field (reflecting the PRE-QUANTUM level of thermal energy of atoms), they do not decay, but are durable due to the continuous replenishment of these losses by the same radiation from outside, from the universal electromagnetic field of space and time.

For example, from the constantly existing microwave radiation, beautifully named, but, in my opinion, erroneously by I.S.Shklovsky “Relic radiation”. This is not a relic, not the radiation of the Big Bang that was stretched out by the “expansion” of space, but the quite relevant and constant, mentioned above, NON-QUANTUM radiation of atoms and “compensatorily” absorbed by them.

Faciant meliora potentes.

If I’m wrong, let my seniors correct me.

14 V 2026