A description of two mental states that are consistent in time and not consistent in subject matter.

I’ll start with dreams, as a chronologically first and easier topic.

According to my long–standing hypothesis, dreams come in two kinds: Dreams that signal the state of the body and dreams that are telepathems captured by the Superconscious from Temporal Waves and diffused from the Superconscious into Consciousness.

When we have some unpleasant dreams that generate longing, hopelessness, these are signals from our body about some kind of serious PROBLEM in it, perhaps “preclinical”, that is, asymptomatic. For NOW! There are symptoms, but they have not yet passed into our Consciousness, but the Superconscious has already caught them, despite their symptomatic weakness, and signals us in the form of dreams.

So, the creepy “Soviet” dreams that Khvorobyev regularly dreams about are not a playful invention of two great literary talents, Ilf and Petrov, but their description of REALITY!

Something in the body of the old monarchist got upset, so he began to have extremely unpleasant and depressing “Soviet” dreams!

To get rid of this rather ordinary thought, I started thinking again about the electrons in the metal and their energy levels. Here, as Khvorobyev (another connection between two seemingly unrelated topics), all sorts of ridiculous and frankly stupid explanations of effects conventionally accepted in the “Holy Physical Scripture” began to come into my head again, such as: “Electrons gain energy, electrons lose energy,” etc.

Question: What kind of energy does or can an electron have?

Let’s start with a “free” electron, that is, one that is not in a certain “potential well”.

The first and main energy is its electric charge and the energy contained in it is mass multiplied by the square of the speed of light E = mc² according to Einstein’s famous formula.

The second type of energy is the energy of its magnetic field, due to the spin of the electron (that is, rotation around its own axis) and its charge, the energy of the magnetic moment.

The third type of energy is the purely kinetic energy of its translational motion.

The fourth type is again the kinetic energy of its rotation around its own axis, the angular momentum of the electron.

So when the mumblings in textbooks, scientific articles, and encyclopedias talk about the acquisition or loss of energy, the question immediately arises, what kind of energy does our hero acquire and lose in different processes?

In all processes except “annihilation”, an electron can increase or decrease, that is, gain or lose, only one thing: the kinetic energy of translational motion.

The other three types remain UNCHANGED! It cannot increase or decrease its charge and its magnetic or rotational moments.

A bound electron has all of the above types of energy MINUS potential, because it is located in a certain potential well, in which it can be higher or lower in terms of energy level (degree of bonding), but always BELOW the ENERGY LEVEL of a FREE ELECTRON.

Returning to the so-called free electrons in a metal. An irrefutably experimentally established fact is that the energy of free electrons, that is, what was said above, the kinetic energy of their translational motion also remains CONSTANT within the temperature range from almost Absolute zero to ten thousand degrees (on the Kelvin scale)! It turns out that the free electrons in a metal ALWAYS have the same energy within these temperature limits (statistically, of course). But then all these ridiculous claims about the thermal emission of electrons, or the transfer of heat along a metal conductor, have nothing to do with the generally accepted chatter about increasing their energy, etc.

Then, along the chain, the following idea came to my head: If so, how does an electromagnetic wave incident on the surface of a metal cause vibrations of these very “monoenergetic” electrons? After all, this means AN INCREASE IN THEIR KINETIC ENERGY DUE TO FLUCTUATIONS in the RHYTHM of changes in the electric field of the wave! Even if, due to the high concentration of free electrons in the metal – 6 x 10 to the twenty–second power in a cubic centimeter, they immediately give it to their neighbors, then their total energy should still increase! And they don’t give it away completely, but THEY THEMSELVES BEGIN TO RADIATE, REFLECT, this wave. It turns out that they don’t give it to their neighbors so quickly, but they manage to radiate some of it back, otherwise the waves, and light waves too, would not be reflected from the metal and instead of a reflective shiny surface we would see only BLACKNESS!

And here the thought slipped down the chain in the last topic:

And, actually, what is an electromagnetic wave?

According to Louis de Broglie, a photon, that is, a quantum of light, is a kind of composite particle. I tried to develop this idea of de Broglie and somehow physically substantiate it, assuming that a photon is a very stable pair of an electron and a positron rotating (unlike the usual one. very short-lived positronium) in STATIONARY orbits around a common center of mass. Since, according to the conclusions of the Special Theory of Relativity, no particle with the so-called rest mass can reach the speed of light (because its inertial mass increases to infinity), this stable positronium HAS a TOTAL REST MASS EQUAL to ZERO, and therefore CAN move with light velocity.

And then there’s the last thought, a very strange and completely unexpected one:

Let’s assume that everything said about stable positronium (due to stationary orbits and zero total mass) is true. HOW DOES THIS PAIR OF ROTATING PARTICLES AND ANTIPARTICLES move in space? THE PLANE OF THEIR ROTATION IS PERPENDICULAR TO the light velocity vector or this vector lies IN THE PLANE OF ROTATION. Up to this point, it intuitively seemed to me that the plane was perpendicular, the rotating particles described as a long spiral line along the flight path. And now it suddenly occurred to me that this is NOT TRUE! After all, if this were the case, then HOW, once on the metal surface, could such a pair move free electrons when their fields MUTUALLY BALANCE each other, the electron repels free electrons in the metal, and the positron immediately attracts them! PRACTICALLY ZERO “electrostatic” effects!

Then only one thing remains: the photon is a stable positronium WHEEL moving at the speed of light!!! It can roll like an ordinary wheel on the road, or it can, with the same success, roll, spinning the OTHER WAY AROUND! This immediately clarifies the concept of light POLARIZATION. The plane of the positron wheel defines the plane of polarization. If it rotates – circular or elliptical polarization. It’s funny and it’s great!!!

But then a thought snaked in, poisoning the neophyte’s joy:

The “electrostatic” effect of an electron and a positron CAN be mutually balanced only IF THEY are very close to each other IN DISTANCE (diameter of rotation)! But who can say AT WHAT DISTANCE FROM EACH OTHER in a stable stationary positronium THEY ROTATE? Depending on the frequency, more precisely the frequency depends on the radius of the orbit, and the smaller it is, the higher the frequency and the greater the energy of the photon! If it is far enough away on the atomic-electronic scale, then each particle CAN exert its own electric and magnetic influence on free electrons.

With this sad phrase, I conclude the current, rather funny, thought chain from Khvorobyev to the positronic wheel rolling through space-time at the speed of light.

It’s scary to even think about WHAT I’m going to dream about next night…

Faciant meliora potentes.

If I’m wrong, let my seniors correct me.

21 VI 2026

P.S. There are NO free electrons in metals! The outer orbits of the metal atoms OVERLAP, and due to this, the electrons REMAINING BOUND ON THEM can freely move in any direction in the metal.

Something similar to cellular SYNTIUM, a certain set of cells that retain their anatomical “individuality”, nevertheless, connected to each other by lined tubules, cytoplasmic junctions.

This overlap, the mutual penetration of the external electronic orbits of metal atoms, explains exactly why “free” electrons, moving chaotically at speeds of 600-2000 km/sec, and “SCATTERING ON DEFECTS”, thermal and alien-atomic, do not at all self-heat a piece of metal in microseconds to billions of degrees, but by the same electrons, slowly drifting with a current of tenths of a millimeter per second, METAL CONDUCTORS ARE HEATED TO RED HEAT!