(Continuation of the theme of the afterword to the note “From the point of view of atoms”)

I will not repeat school truths and remind you of the great Lenz rule, which, in fact, is the Law of Inertia of the Magnetic Field and it should be introduced in the form of one of the fundamental laws of not only electromagnetism, but also mechanics called “The Newton-Faraday-Lenz Law of Inertia of the Magnetic Field.”

I’ll get right to the point of this note. If the hypothesis about the applicability of the Lenz Rule to atomic structures, in particular, to the configuration changes of the electronic orbits of atoms, is correct, then this means that in the narrow transition zone of two conductors of different electrical conductivity, not only purely thermolectric Seebeck-Peltier effects are observed, but also corresponding electrical effects, as well as local changes in the magnetic field!

Unfortunately, in the literature on thermoelectric effects, these possible “bursts” of the magnetic field are not even mentioned.

Various electrical and thermal effects are described in the description of thermomagnetic phenomena:

Nernst-Ettinghausen, longitudinal and transverse electrical effects.

Rigi-Leduc, Magi-Rigi-Leduc, thermal effects.

But they are talking about the effect of an EXTERNAL magnetic field on thermocouples.

In my own note and brief P.S. it is said about the INTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELD of the conduction electrons themselves and its interaction with the magnetic fields of the electronic orbits of atoms of conductors with different electrical conductivity. Moreover, this interaction is so significant that it changes the configuration of the electronic orbits of the atoms of matter, heating or cooling it.

In principle, it is possible to detect such hypothetical surges of the magnetic field in a thin transition zone if a solenoid is brought closer to this zone, the output of which is fed to a broadband signal amplifier and then to any recording device. When direct current is applied, electromagnetic induction phenomena should be observed in the transition zones, while in all other sections of the closed circuit they will not be. These “spikes” of the magnetic field inside the transition zone should be especially strong for p/n semiconductors.

Of course, provided that the reasoning in the note, and especially in the afterword, is correct.

Some hint of the correctness of these arguments is contained in the description of the “Magnetocaloric effect – a change in the temperature of a magnetic substance with an adiabatic change in the strength of the magnetic field in which this magnetic is located.” We are talking about para- and ferromagnets. But, I believe, a diamagnetics can also exhibit similar temperature changes (that is, changes in the level of thermal energy of the magnetic due to magnetization or demagnetization).

When the magnetic field decreases, for example, the magnetic COOLS. It is known that this method is used to further lower the temperature of samples of substances that have already reached cryotemperature. Again, here we are also talking about the EXTERNAL field, but its connection with the internal atomic orbital and spin fields is obvious.

It is possible that even a magnetomechanical (gyromagnetic Einstein-de Haas effect) can be observed if suitable degrees of “kinetic” freedom are provided to the transition zone.

To summarize:

In the light of the above, it is very possible that the considerations expressed in the note, and equally in my P.S. to it, contain “quite SUITABLE for germination” seeds of common sense.

It remains to vernalize and plant them, and then observe WHAT PLANTS WILL GROW FROM THEM!

Faciant meliora potentes.

If I’m wrong, let my seniors correct me.

1 VII 2026